Cross-platform apps for businesses that need booking, loyalty, ordering or a customer account in a pocket — not a novelty that gets deleted in week two.
We will say that on the first call if it is true. A responsive website does ninety percent of what most companies want from an app, without the store approvals, the update cycle or the download barrier.
An app earns its cost when it does something a browser genuinely cannot: push notifications people welcome, offline use, a loyalty card that lives on the home screen, or repeat ordering that has to be two taps.
Built once in React Native or Flutter and shipped to both stores, unless there is a good reason to go fully native.
Appointments, staff selection, live availability and reminders. For salons, clinics, studios and anyone whose diary is the business.
Repeat purchase in a couple of taps, saved baskets and order history. Where an app really does beat a mobile site.
Digital cards, points, tiers and member-only pricing that live on the home screen instead of in a wallet nobody carries.
An app that sits alongside your existing store or platform, sharing the same accounts, catalogue and order data through the API.
Field teams, stock counts, job sheets and delivery confirmation. Often the highest-return app a business builds, and the least glamorous.
Sign-in, social login, biometric unlock and account management done to store requirements rather than improvised.
Payments, CRM, ERP, delivery providers and your existing website, connected properly rather than duplicated.
Notifications people do not immediately disable, built around events that matter to the user rather than to your marketing calendar.
App Store and Play Store listings, screenshots, review responses and the resubmissions that follow a rejection.
How We Build
We would rather launch a focused version in ten weeks and improve it with real usage data than spend nine months building features nobody asked for.
Talk Through Your IdeaOne sentence on what the app is for and who opens it. If we cannot write that sentence, we are not ready to build.
Wireframes for the three or four journeys that matter, then interface design that follows platform conventions.
One codebase in React Native or Flutter, so a change ships to both stores instead of being written twice.
On actual phones, including older Android models with poor connections, because that is what a lot of customers have.
Store listings, screenshots, privacy declarations and the review process, handled by us.
Real usage tells you which half of the feature list was worth building. Then we build the next thing.
Everything needed to have a real app in two stores, not a prototype on a laptop.
iOS and Android from one codebase, so the feature set and the fixes stay in step instead of drifting apart.
Screenshots, descriptions, keywords and privacy declarations prepared and submitted, including the resubmission after a rejection.
Either connected to what you already run, or built for you if there is nothing there yet.
So you know what people actually do in the app, and you hear about a crash before your customers tell you.
Authentication, secure storage and permission handling built to what the stores require, not what is quickest.
Apps are not finished at launch. Both platforms change every year, and an unmaintained app eventually stops being accepted.
Most app projects sit on top of a store or platform. These are live client builds where we own that side too.
We build cross-platform for most clients. Here is when that is right and when it is not.
Every one begins with a call where we may well tell you not to build an app at all.
Two weeks to work out whether the app is worth building, what it should do first, and what it will cost.
Design through to two live store listings, built cross-platform from a single codebase.
Because the platforms change every year whether or not your app does.
We will happily talk you out of an app if a better mobile site does the job for a fraction of the cost.
Ask Us DirectlyOften not, and we will say so. An app is worth it when it does something a browser cannot — push notifications people welcome, offline use, or repeat ordering that has to be two taps. If your idea is mostly your website in a wrapper, a better mobile site is the cheaper answer.
Both, almost always, and from one codebase so it does not cost twice. Which one you promote first depends on where your customers are, and we can look at your analytics to find out rather than guess.
Ten to sixteen weeks for a focused first version. Longer if there is no backend to connect to and we are building that as well. We would rather ship a small version and improve it than disappear for nine months.
Budget for it from the start. Apple and Google change their requirements every year, certificates expire, and an app that is not maintained eventually stops being accepted. Ongoing cost is a fraction of the build, but it is not zero.
Sometimes, on the first submission — it is routine, not a disaster. We handle the response and resubmission. The common causes are privacy declarations, sign-in requirements and unclear purpose, and we design around them from the start.
Yes, and that is usually the right approach. Shared accounts, one catalogue, one source of order data. Running an app on a separate database from your store is how inventory and pricing drift apart.
You do. The developer accounts are in your name, the code is yours, and we hand over everything at the end. We will set the accounts up with you rather than under our own.
Usually. We audit the codebase first and tell you honestly whether it is maintainable or whether a rebuild will cost less over two years. Not every inherited codebase is worth saving.
Built in, but used carefully. The fastest way to get uninstalled is to send marketing pushes nobody asked for. We tie notifications to events the user actually cares about.
That is what the scoping sprint and a small first release are for. You learn from real usage and adjust, instead of finding out after a year of building the wrong thing.
